Apologies for the light posting this week. I’ve been in Northern Ireland where I met someone who was studying criminology. Her key concern was the question of local control of policing and populism: Would devolved policing result in a deterioration into populism.
Northern Ireland is an interesting case in point, given the historic divides. Unionists, with some spectacular exceptions, have often been close to the model of the deferential working class found elsewhere in the UK. Republicans, on the other hand, have a … er … history … of scepticism about the authority of state justice.<<< understatement of the year!
How far would Northern Ireland provide a good model for looking at the general question of devolved policing?
All of this is a prelude to a link to this post on the LGIU blog: Localise criminal justice now. And this brilliant one about waste and decentralisation.
The latter link has some interesting implications: How far is the current centralised model of policing (lots of form filling, procedures and risk aversion) predicated on the need to keep highly paid managers apprised of the information that they need to make the right decisions, and to ensure that when the wrong ones are made, that the same managers aren’t blamed?.
The other post I’ve seen that is worth a look is this one about the speed of decision-making. It raises three questions:
- Has the active internet forced the speed of decisions up?
- Are those decisions better as a result?
- Is there a role that public bodies could be playing to deal with this issue?
Filed under: Centralisation, Deliberative democracy, Public administration, Web 2.0 and democracy | Tagged: Devolution, Policing, Populism, Sub-optimal policymaking | Leave a comment »